Section 5.5 · Topic 8 of 12
5.5.8 Potential functions
In electrostatics the field followed from a scalar potential, (Section 3.3), and in magnetostatics from a vector potential, (Section 4.1). Potentials are often easier to compute than fields, because they are integrals of the sources without the vector products of Coulomb's and Biot–Savart's laws. Do they survive when the fields vary in time?
The vector potential. still works. It was possible in magnetostatics because (a field without divergence is the curl of some vector field), and the fourth Maxwell equation says that holds for all fields, static or not. So we keep
The scalar potential. does not survive, because it would give and contradict Faraday's law. Substitute Eq. (5.5.34) into the first Maxwell equation instead:
Collecting both terms under one curl,
because a field with zero curl is the gradient of a scalar (Section 3.3), and we call that scalar as in electrostatics. Finally we get
With these, and Faraday's law hold identically, for any and .
The electric field has two parts. is the field of the charges, as in electrostatics. is the induced field of Faraday's law: a changing current changes , and the rate of change of is an electric field with a curl.
The new term is why alone no longer describes , and why the "voltage" between two points depends on the path in a time-varying field (Section 5.3, Exercise 5.5.7). The potentials pay off in three ways (Figure 5.5.7): two of the four Maxwell equations are satisfied automatically, four unknown functions (, , , ) replace the six components of and , and, with a suitable choice made below, the remaining two equations decouple.
The equation for A, step by step
Substitute Eq. (5.5.37) into the second Maxwell equation, written for a nonconducting medium (, so that is the source current alone) as :
Multiply by and expand the double curl with Eq. (5.5.6):
Collect the two gradients on one side:
The definition fixes only the curl of . Its divergence is still ours to choose (Section 5.5.9 makes this precise), and the natural choice is the one that removes the bracket.
The Lorenz condition, or Lorenz gauge for the potentials, is the choice
With Eq. (5.5.41) the bracket in Eq. (5.5.40) vanishes and obeys a wave equation of its own, driven by the current alone:
The equation for V
Substitute Eq. (5.5.37) into the third Maxwell equation, :
The Lorenz gauge replaces by , and the scalar potential obeys a wave equation driven by the charge alone.
Both potentials obey the same wave equation, driven by and each Cartesian component of by the same component of . One method of solution serves all four.
Table 5.5.2 sets these results beside the static ones of Chapters 3 and 4. Each static equation gains one term, , and the gauge condition gains . Dropping these terms again is the quasi-static approximation of circuit theory, justified when the region of interest is small compared with the wavelength (Section 5.5.10).
Table 5.5.2. Potentials of static and of time-varying fields. The static equations are those of Sections 3.3 and 4.1 with , replaced by , .
| Static | Time-varying (Lorenz gauge) | |
|---|---|---|
| gauge | ||
| scalar potential | ||
| vector potential | ||
| electric field | ||
| magnetic field |
The condition Eq. (5.5.41) is due to the Danish physicist L. V. Lorenz (1867). It is often printed as "Lorentz gauge", after H. A. Lorentz of the Lorentz force, who used it later. Cheng's book calls it the Lorentz condition.