Section 2.3 · Topic 5 of 11
2.3.5 Cartesian vs. cylindrical coordinates
A vector at a point can be expressed in either system:
The vector itself is the same arrow. Only the set of unit vectors used to describe it differs (Figure 2.3.13). Since the unit vectors of each system are orthonormal, each component is a projection (Section 2.1): , , , . The dot products between the unit vectors of the two systems follow from Eqs. (2.3.19) and (2.3.20) and are collected in Table 2.3.2.
Table 2.3.2. Dot products of Cartesian and cylindrical unit vectors.
Taking the dot product of Eq. (2.3.27) with and with ,
while is common to both systems. In matrix form, the conversion between Cartesian and cylindrical components of a vector is
The two matrices are transposes of each other and their product is the identity matrix: the transformation is a rotation by the angle about the -axis, which preserves lengths, so .
- Transform the components with Eq. (2.3.28): , , unchanged.
- Replace the coordinates in the expressions: , (Eq. (2.3.15)).
- Simplify (often with ), and check that the magnitude is unchanged.
For a single vector located at a given point, use the angle of that point. The reverse conversion uses Eqs. (2.3.29) and (2.3.16).
For example, for ,
so : a field circulating clockwise around the -axis with a strength proportional to the distance from it (Figure 2.3.14), which is far from obvious in the Cartesian form. Note that in the conversion matrix is the angle of the point at which the vector is located, and for a vector field it varies from point to point.
Converting only the components and forgetting the coordinates (or the other way round). After step 1 of the recipe the expressions still contain and , but a vector field in cylindrical coordinates must be written with , , only. Conversely, a cylindrical expression like is not converted to Cartesian form by replacing with alone: must be replaced as well.
Table 2.3.3 summarises the two systems side by side.
Table 2.3.3. The two coordinate systems of this section at a glance.
| Cartesian | Cylindrical | |
|---|---|---|
| ranges | , , | |
| position vector | ||
| scale factors | ||
| , , | , , | |
| unit vectors | constant | depend on |
Integration in cylindrical coordinates
The following examples use the cylindrical elements (2.3.24) to (2.3.26). In each one the surface or volume is bounded by coordinate surfaces of the cylindrical system, so the limits are constants, whereas in Cartesian coordinates they would be functions such as .
Example 2.3.11Circumference of a circle Example 2.3.12Area of a circle Example 2.3.13Lateral area of a cylinder Example 2.3.14Volume of a cylinder Example 2.3.15A closed line integral in cylindrical coordinatesThree ideas of the first part of this section carry the rest of the course: the position and displacement vectors , and , the scale factors , and the habit of reducing every line, surface and volume integral to ordinary integrals with constant limits by choosing coordinates that fit the geometry. With nothing more than these, Section 2.3.6 develops spherical coordinates, Section 2.3.10 writes the gradient, divergence, curl and Laplacian in curvilinear coordinates, and Section 2.4 turns the definitions of divergence and curl into the integral theorems of Gauss and Stokes.