Section 3.3 · Topic 6 of 8

3.3.6 Applications of the electrostatic potential

Interactive: Electron Beam Deflection

The potential turns a vector problem into a scalar one: one number per point, from which recovers the field and the energy exchanged with a charge. It is also the quantity a voltmeter measures, so most practical statements about static fields are in fact statements about volts. The two applications of this subsection (Figure 3.3.18) each rest on one formula of this section: the work–voltage relation and Laplace's equation in a conducting medium. Table 3.3.3 at the end of the subsection lists where each one is worked out with numbers.

The two applications of the electrostatic potential discussed in this subsection. 3.3.1 Electron guns and the electron volt: qV=\tfrac12mv^{2}, the accelerating voltage sets the beam energy in CRTs, electron microscopes, X-ray tubes.
Figure 3.3.18. The two applications of the electrostatic potential discussed in this subsection. 3.3.1 Electron guns and the electron volt: , the accelerating voltage sets the beam energy in CRTs, electron microscopes, X-ray tubes.
3.3.2 Earthing and step voltage: the potential around an earth electrode falls as 1/r, and its gradient is what a person standing nearby feels.
3.3.2 Earthing and step voltage: the potential around an earth electrode falls as , and its gradient is what a person standing nearby feels.
Application 3.3.1 · Electron guns and the electron volt

Energy = charge × voltage

By Eq. (3.3.11) the work done on a charge between two points is fixed by the potential difference, whatever the path. Consider an electron (charge ) released at rest from a heated cathode at potential and accelerated towards an anode at (Figure 3.3.19). The work done by the field on the electron is the negative of the work an external agent would have to do, , and it all goes into kinetic energy:

Only the potential difference matters: the shapes of the electrodes determine the trajectory and the focusing of the beam, but not the final speed. Between plane electrodes a distance apart the potential rises linearly, , and the field is uniform (Problem 3.3.1). It points from the anode to the cathode, and the force on the electron points towards the anode. A negative charge "rolls uphill" in : for it, the landscape is turned upside down.

An electron gun. Electrons leave the heated cathode at rest, are accelerated by the uniform field between the plane electrodes and leave through the hole in the anode with kinetic energy eV_a. Right: the potential along the axis, rising linearly across the gap and constant beyond the anode (field-free drift space).
Figure 3.3.19. An electron gun. Electrons leave the heated cathode at rest, are accelerated by the uniform field between the plane electrodes and leave through the hole in the anode with kinetic energy . Right: the potential along the axis, rising linearly across the gap and constant beyond the anode (field-free drift space).

The electron volt

The energy an electron gains when it passes through a potential difference of one volt is called one electron volt:

A 25 kV tube produces 25 keV electrons: in this unit the energy is the accelerating voltage. Typical accelerating voltages are about 25 kV in a colour cathode-ray tube, 1–30 kV in a scanning electron microscope, 80–300 kV in a transmission electron microscope and 30–150 kV in a medical X-ray tube. In an X-ray tube the whole energy of one electron can be converted into a single photon, so the shortest emitted wavelength is (the Duane–Hunt law). For this is about 12 pm.

Raise the accelerating voltage and note that the electron arrives faster but is deflected less by the same plate voltage: the transit time between the plates shrinks.

InteractiveLoading simulation…
Quick check

An electron starts at rest at a point at and arrives at a point at . How much kinetic energy has it gained, in eV and in J? Would a proton gain energy on the same trip?

. A proton (charge ) would lose on that trip. In fact it cannot make it at all if it starts at rest, because for a positive charge the point at is "uphill".

Application 3.3.2 · Earthing: touch and step voltage

E = −∇V under our feet

When a fault current flows into the ground through an earth electrode, it spreads out through the soil. In this application denotes the resistivity of the soil (typically 10–1000 m), not a charge density. In the soil the current density and the field are related by Ohm's law, . In steady state no charge accumulates anywhere in the (homogeneous) soil, so , hence , and with :

The potential in the soil obeys Laplace's equation again, and the solutions of Problems 3.3.1–3.3.3 apply. (A steady current field is curl-free just like an electrostatic one, so the potential concept carries over unchanged.)

For a hemispherical electrode of radius the current leaves radially and crosses hemispheres of area , so and

with remote earth as the reference, . This is the solution of Laplace's equation found in Problem 3.3.3.

A fault current I enters the soil through a hemispherical earth electrode. The equipotentials in the soil are hemispheres, V=\rho I/(2\pi r). A person touching an earthed structure bridges the touch voltage, while a person standing nearby bridges the step voltage between the feet.
Figure 3.3.20. A fault current enters the soil through a hemispherical earth electrode. The equipotentials in the soil are hemispheres, . A person touching an earthed structure bridges the touch voltage, while a person standing nearby bridges the step voltage between the feet.

Definitions

The quantities used in earthing design follow directly from Eq. (3.3.19) (Figure 3.3.20):

  • the earth potential rise , the voltage of the electrode and of everything bonded to it with respect to remote earth, which during a fault can reach tens of kilovolts (the ratio is the resistance of the electrode),
  • the touch voltage , which appears across the body of a person whose hand is on the earthed structure while the feet stand at distance , and
  • the step voltage , which appears between the two feet, about one metre apart, of a person standing at distance .

Both the touch and the step voltage are largest where is largest, i.e. next to the electrode. For , m and the electrode rises to 31.8 kV. A person touching it with the feet 1 m from its edge () is exposed to 21.2 kV, and a person merely standing with the feet at and from its centre to 7.96 kV between the feet, falling to 0.53 kV for –6 m (Worked example 3.3.2). Figure 3.3.21 reads these numbers off the potential curve: touch and step voltages are simply vertical distances on it.

The potential V(r)=\rho I/(2\pi r) at the ground surface around the electrode of Figure 3.3.20, for a=0.5 m, \rho=100\ \Omega\,m and I=1 kA (Worked example 3.3.2). The touch and step voltages are vertical differences on this curve. They are large where the curve is steep (close to the electrode) and small far away, where it is flat.
Figure 3.3.21. The potential at the ground surface around the electrode of Figure 3.3.20, for m, m and kA (Worked example 3.3.2). The touch and step voltages are vertical differences on this curve. They are large where the curve is steep (close to the electrode) and small far away, where it is flat.

Remedy

Standards for substation earthing (such as IEEE Std 80) set limits for both quantities. The remedy is equipotential bonding: a buried earthing mesh under the whole station brings everything a person can touch or stand on to nearly the same potential, i.e. it makes small where people are. A surface layer of high-resistivity crushed rock further limits the current that can flow through the body.

In plain words

What hurts is not the voltage of the ground but the voltage between the two points the body touches. Earthing design is the art of making the potential landscape flat where people stand.

Table 3.3.3. The applications of this section, the physics they use and where they are worked out.

ApplicationPhysics usedWorked out in
3.3.1 Electron gun, electron voltProblem 3.3.1, Worked example 3.3.1
3.3.2 EarthingLaplace's equation in soil, Problem 3.3.3, Worked example 3.3.2

← Back to Section 3.3 contents

Electromagnetic Fields and Waves · Prof. Gökhan Çınar© 2026 Gökhan Çınar. All rights reserved. Copyright