Section 4.3 · Topic 6 of 10
4.3.6 Saturation and hysteresis: the limits of the reluctance
The reluctance presumes a constant . For iron this is not so. Figure 4.3.8 shows the relation between and in a ferromagnetic core as the current of its winding is cycled. Starting from an unmagnetised core, follows the initial curve: it rises steeply at first, then more and more slowly, and finally the material saturates at (about for iron and steel), beyond which grows only as , as if the core were air. When is reduced again, does not retrace the initial curve but stays higher: at a remanent induction is left, and a reverse field, the coercive field , is needed to bring back to zero. Cycling between large positive and negative values traces the closed hysteresis loop. In iron, is therefore a function of and of the previous history of the material.
A magnetic circuit with iron in it is therefore a nonlinear circuit. The loop rule still holds, but it is written with and rather than with reluctances:
This is exactly how Problems 4.3.1–4.3.3 at the end of this section are solved. One never computes . One reads off the curve of the material for the value of that each branch carries, multiplies by the length of the branch, and adds the gap term , for which the constant is exact. Only in the home exercises and most of the further exercises, where is given as a constant, is used directly.
Around every closed path of a circuit with iron,
When the iron is nonlinear, forget . Carry from branch to branch with the node rule ( is conserved, ), look up on the curve, and add up around the loop.
Two consequences of the loop are worth remembering.
- Saturation. Beyond the core stops helping: and the winding behaves like an air coil. A core is therefore designed to run below , and the "plateau" of the solution of Problem 4.3.1 shows what happens when a branch saturates: however hard the rest of the circuit is driven, that branch will not pass more flux.
- Losses. Each cycle round the loop costs an energy per unit volume equal to the area of the loop, in , so the hysteresis power is proportional to the frequency, . In a solid core the alternating flux also induces eddy currents, with a power where is the thickness of the laminations, which is why cores for alternating flux are built from thin insulated sheets.
Soft and hard magnetic materials
The shape of the loop decides what a material is good for. A soft material (narrow loop, small ) is what one wants in a core: it magnetises easily and loses little per cycle. A hard material (wide loop, large ) keeps its magnetisation when the field is removed: it is a permanent magnet. Table 4.3.2 gives typical figures. The column is the ceiling of every magnetic circuit built with that material, and the column is what the material "remembers" when the current is switched off.
Table 4.3.2. Typical soft and hard magnetic materials.
| material | or | typical use | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 % Ni permalloy | shields, sensor cores | ||
| Mn–Zn ferrite | – | – | switch-mode transformers |
| grain-oriented Si steel | – | power transformers | |
| hard ferrite (magnet) | small motors, loudspeakers | ||
| Nd–Fe–B (magnet) | servo and traction motors |
Compare a soft material with a magnet (Nd–Fe–B, against ) and see how and the loop area change by five orders of magnitude.
Computing with a handbook value of and then finding in a limb. Real iron saturates near , and a linear calculation that lands above is simply wrong: the limb would saturate, its permeability would collapse towards , and the fluxes would be redistributed (Exercise 4.3.4 runs into exactly this). Whenever a linear answer approaches , switch to the – curve.
A cast-steel branch long must carry , for which the curve of Figure 4.3.21 gives . A air gap carries the same . Which takes more ampere-turns?
The steel takes . The gap takes . The millimetre of air costs slightly more than the metre of steel.